×

Japan says U.S. sanctions on ICC, President Akane ‘very unfortunate’

Japan says U.S. sanctions on ICC, President Akane ‘very unfortunate’

Japan’s foreign ‌ministry said on Wednesday that U.S. sanctions  on the ‌International Criminal ⁠Court and ⁠its ⁠president, Judge Tomoko ‌Akane, were “very unfortunate.”

In ⁠a statement, ⁠the ministry said: “Japan has consistently supported the ICC … ⁠in ⁠its efforts to ‌prosecute and punish the most serious crimes ‌of concern to the international community and to uphold the rule of law.” It ​added that Japan would ‌remain committed to strengthening the rule of law ‌in the international ⁠community ⁠while maintaining communication ​with related ⁠countries.

The U.S. imposed sanctions on Tuesday on Akane and a senior trial lawyer at the court, Secretary of State Marco ‌Rubio said.

The move is the latest escalation in the Trump administration’s campaign against The Hague-based court, which was established in 2002 by the international community to prosecute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. The U.S. is not a member of the court.

Rubio said ‌in a statement that he was imposing sanctions on Akane and Abdoulaye Seye, a senior trial lawyer and a ⁠Senegalese national, under a ⁠Trump executive order last year authorizing sanctions against the court.

“These individuals have directly engaged in efforts by the ‌ICC to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute officials whose government has not consented to ICC jurisdiction,” Rubio said.

The ICC condemned ⁠the move, saying in a statement that the measures undermine ⁠the rule of law.

“When judicial actors are threatened for applying the law, it is the international legal order itself that is placed at risk,” the ICC said.

Seye is a senior trial lawyer on the prosecution team that sought an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has been nominated ⁠for election as an ICC judge.

The U.S. effort has put it at odds with allies in Europe.

Dutch Foreign Minister ⁠Tom Berendsen said on X that the Netherlands, ‌which hosts the court, disapproved of the latest U.S. sanctions and he had invited Akane to “discuss our continued support.”

“International courts and tribunals must be able to freely carry out their mandates,” Berendsen wrote.

Akane warned in December that the U.S. sanctions would “rapidly undermine the court’s operations in all situations and cases, and jeopardize its very existence”.

The U.S. ‌imposed targeted sanctions last year on several ICC officials, including prosecutors and judges, citing the ICC’s arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as a past probe into U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

The sanctions freeze any U.S. assets the individuals may have and essentially cut them off from the U.S. financial system, with which almost all internationally operating banks have close ties.

The U.S. Treasury Department also issued a general license on Tuesday authorizing the wind-down of transactions involving Akane and Seye through September 17.

‘DEFENDING’ NETANYAHU

Three ICC judges sued Trump and his ​administration in June over the sanctions, arguing the measures were unlawful.

Advocacy groups, in two separate lawsuits, have said that the U.S. campaign infringes on the constitutional rights of organizations working with the court to seek ‌justice for atrocities around the world.

Rubio said last month that the administration would step up efforts to undermine the ICC, including a diplomatic campaign aimed at persuading other countries to quit the institution, a call that at least five countries have already heeded.

Rubio argued that the ‌court posed a threat to U.S. personnel carrying out U.S. President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration policies or strikes ⁠on boats accused of carrying drugs, as ⁠well as other U.S. service members.

Trump has said the campaign ​was aimed at defending Netanyahu and others from prosecution, rather than Trump himself.

The U.S. has never ⁠been a member of the court. The ‌ICC asserts jurisdiction only if a member state is unable or unwilling to prosecute ​atrocities itself.

However, the ICC statute also gives the court the power to prosecute atrocity crimes committed on the territory of member states by nationals of non-member states.

© Thomson Reuters 2026.

Post Comment